Incoterms for Industrial Spares From China
EXW, FOB, CIF and DAP account for almost all industrial equipment shipments, and buyers routinely compare quotes on different terms as though they were the same number. What each actually obliges.
EXW, FOB, CIF and DAP account for almost all industrial equipment shipments, and buyers routinely compare quotes on different terms as though they were the same number. What each actually obliges.
Incoterms decide who arranges transport, who pays for it, where risk transfers, and - the part that causes most disputes - who handles customs at each end. For industrial spares moving out of China, the difference between EXW and DAP can be several weeks and a material share of the landed cost, and buyers routinely compare quotes on different terms as though they were the same number. This guide covers the four terms that account for almost all industrial equipment shipments, what each actually obliges, and how to choose.
| Term | Seller arranges | Risk transfers at | Buyer handles |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXW | Nothing beyond making goods available | Seller's premises | Export clearance, all transport, import clearance, delivery |
| FOB | Export clearance and delivery on board vessel | On board at named port of shipment | Main carriage, insurance, import clearance, delivery |
| CIF | Export clearance, main carriage, minimum insurance | On board at port of shipment | Import clearance, duties, delivery from port |
| DAP | Everything to the named destination | At named destination, ready for unloading | Import clearance and duties |
The single most misread column is the third. Under CIF the seller pays for carriage to the destination port but risk has already transferred at the origin port. If the vessel is lost, the buyer bears the loss and claims on the insurance the seller arranged. CIF is not a delivered term, and treating it as one is the most common Incoterms misunderstanding in industrial trade.
EXW gives the buyer maximum control and, on paper, the lowest price. In practice it creates a specific problem for shipments out of China: the buyer is formally responsible for export clearance, but a foreign buyer generally cannot act as exporter of record in China. The result is either the seller performing export formalities without contractual obligation, or a shipment that cannot leave.
For most industrial buyers, FCA - where the seller handles export clearance and delivers to a named place - achieves what they wanted from EXW without the structural problem. If you are asking for EXW because you want to control freight, ask for FCA instead.
FOB is the default for containerised sea freight in this trade and it is a sensible default. The seller handles export clearance and gets goods on board; the buyer controls carriage, which means the buyer controls schedule, carrier choice and cost, and can consolidate with other shipments.
CIF suits buyers without a forwarder relationship, or where the buyer wants a single landed-to-port number for budgeting. Two cautions.
First, the insurance obligation under CIF is minimum cover, which is a restricted-perils policy, not all-risks. For industrial equipment this is frequently inadequate. If you want all-risks cover, specify it explicitly in the contract - "CIF Cartagena, insurance to Institute Cargo Clauses (A) for 110% of invoice value" - rather than assuming.
Second, CIF ends at the destination port. Terminal handling charges at destination, customs clearance, duties, storage and inland transport all fall to the buyer. Buyers comparing a CIF quote against a DAP quote are comparing two different scopes.
DAP delivers to the named place - often the buyer's plant - with the seller carrying transport and risk the whole way. It is the cleanest term for a buyer who wants one number and no logistics involvement.
The trap is import clearance. Under DAP the buyer clears the goods and pays duty and import taxes. Buyers frequently read DAP as fully delivered and are surprised by a duty and VAT invoice. If you want the seller to bear import clearance and duty, that is DDP - and DDP is often impractical because the seller must act as importer of record, which in many jurisdictions requires local registration the seller does not have.
A large share of industrial spare parts move by air because the part is small and the outage is expensive. The sea terms map awkwardly onto air freight - FOB in particular is a maritime term. For air, the correct terms are FCA (seller delivers to the carrier), CPT or CIP (seller pays carriage, and under CIP insurance, to destination), or DAP.
CIP is worth noting because, unlike CIF, its insurance obligation is all-risks cover as standard - the higher level. If you are moving a high-value control board by air, CIP gives you better cover than CIF would on the same value by sea.
An Incoterm without a named place is incomplete and unenforceable in the way it was intended. Write "FOB Shanghai, Incoterms 2020" or "DAP Buyer's warehouse, Lagos, Incoterms 2020". Name the version, because the terms have changed between revisions - DAT became DPU in the 2020 revision, and insurance levels under CIF and CIP diverged.
And put the documentation obligations in the contract separately. Incoterms allocate cost and risk; they do not specify that you get a certificate of origin, mill certificates, serial-numbered packing lists or a certificate of authenticity. Those are contract terms, and for industrial equipment they matter as much as the delivery term.
Insurance is the most misunderstood element of Incoterms, because only two terms oblige the seller to arrange it at all, and the two oblige different levels.
| Term | Seller must insure? | Level |
|---|---|---|
| EXW, FCA, FOB, CFR, CPT, DAP, DPU, DDP | No | Neither party is obliged. The party bearing risk should insure their own interest. |
| CIF | Yes | Minimum cover - Institute Cargo Clauses (C) or equivalent. Restricted perils. |
| CIP | Yes | All-risks cover - Institute Cargo Clauses (A) or equivalent, under Incoterms 2020. |
Two practical implications. Under CIF, the buyer receives insurance that covers a restricted list of perils and excludes many ordinary causes of cargo damage - the cover is genuinely minimal and for industrial equipment it is usually inadequate. Specify a higher level contractually if you want one. And under the terms where nobody is obliged to insure, cargo frequently travels uninsured because each party assumed the other had arranged it. Confirm explicitly who is insuring, at what level, and for what value.
Every Incoterm defines two separate points: where risk passes from seller to buyer, and how far the seller pays. On the "C" terms - CFR, CIF, CPT, CIP - these points are different, and that asymmetry is the single largest source of Incoterms disputes in industrial trade.
Under CIF Cartagena, the seller pays freight and insurance to Cartagena, but risk passed when the goods were loaded in China. If the container is damaged in transit, it is the buyer's loss, claimed against the policy the seller bought. Buyers routinely assume that because the seller is paying to Cartagena, the seller carries the goods to Cartagena. They do not. On the "D" terms - DAP, DPU, DDP - risk and cost both transfer at destination, which is why those terms feel intuitively simpler.
Incoterms interact directly with payment mechanisms, and a mismatch stalls payment even when the goods have arrived safely.
We quote FOB and CIF as standard alternatives on sea shipments, and CIP or DAP on air, with the named place and the Incoterms version stated explicitly on every offer. Where a buyer asks for DDP we confirm first whether we can act as importer of record in that country; where we cannot, we say so and propose DAP with the import formalities on the buyer's side, rather than accepting a term we cannot perform.
We also state separately what documentation accompanies the shipment - certificate of origin, manufacturer certificates, serial-numbered packing list, and conformity documentation where the destination requires it - because Incoterms allocate cost and risk and say nothing about the paperwork that decides whether goods clear. On industrial equipment, that paperwork is frequently the difference between a delivery and a delay.
Beyond the four that dominate industrial trade, five more exist and appear occasionally enough to be worth recognising.
Browse the part numbers behind this article, or send the list straight to our team.
Standard response within 24 hours.
How industrial equipment vendors get on the Saudi Aramco approved list — IKTVA documentation, SABER conformity, SAES technical specifications, and the realistic timeline from registration to first PO.
The vendor registration path into QatarEnergy and QatarEnergy LNG — North Field expansion procurement, Ras Laffan delivery documentation, and the approved-vendor framework that runs through the EPCs.
A vendor's guide to Petroleum Development Oman pre-qualification, the OQ vendor framework, and how Oman's In-Country Value (ICV) policy actually decides equipment-supply contracts.